Daily community briefing · July 18, 2026
Community Reacts to TRUMP Token's Dramatic Fall and Political Ties
The cryptocurrency community is abuzz with discussions surrounding the TRUMP token's staggering 98% decline from its all-time high, raising concerns about potential pump-and-dump schemes. Additionally, revelations about former President Trump's significant earnings from crypto ventures have sparked debates about the intersection of politics and cryptocurrency.
- Community tone
- Mixed
- Source discussions
- 4
- Combined engagement
- 3,336
- Reading time
- 3 minutes
What the conversation signals
The cryptocurrency community is currently focused on the dramatic decline of the TRUMP token, which has plummeted 98% from its all-time high of $74.34 to just $1.52. This sharp drop has led many users to label it a classic example of a pump-and-dump scheme, where early investors and insiders profit at the expense of retail investors. The post by u/Lower_Ad_1146, which has garnered significant attention with over 2,100 upvotes, highlights the frustration of those who bought into the token based on political hype, only to be left with substantial losses. Community sentiment is largely bearish regarding TRUMP, with many expressing anger and disappointment over the apparent manipulation of the token's value.
In contrast to the negative sentiment surrounding the TRUMP token, discussions have also surfaced regarding former President Trump's reported earnings from cryptocurrency ventures. A post by u/Traditional_Blood799 reveals that Trump reportedly took in about $1.2 billion from crypto businesses last year. This figure has prompted discussions about the legitimacy of Trump's involvement in the crypto space and whether his political connections have played a role in his financial gains. The community appears divided on this topic, with some users skeptical about the accuracy of these claims and others questioning the ethical implications of a political figure profiting from a volatile market.
Another post by u/The_Flaneur_Films further explores Trump's crypto earnings, suggesting that Justin Sun, the founder of TRON, may have played a significant role in facilitating these profits. This connection raises questions about the influence of prominent figures in the crypto industry and their potential impact on market dynamics. While some community members are intrigued by the possibility of collaboration between Trump and Sun, others express concern about the implications of such partnerships on the integrity of the cryptocurrency market.
Amidst the discussions about TRUMP and Trump's financial dealings, another post by u/Timely-Fig2030 reflects on the Basic Attention Token (BAT), which has recently fallen below its all-time low. The author shares their personal experience with BAT and expresses disappointment over the project's trajectory. This post has sparked a wave of nostalgia and concern for users who remember BAT's initial promise and are now questioning its viability in the current market. The community's reaction to BAT is mixed, with some users expressing hope for a revival while others seem resigned to its decline.
Overall, the current discussions on r/CryptoCurrency highlight a broader tension between the speculative nature of certain tokens and the political implications of cryptocurrency investments. The TRUMP token's collapse serves as a cautionary tale for retail investors, while the revelations about Trump's earnings raise ethical questions about the intersection of politics and finance. As the community continues to navigate these complex issues, it remains clear that sentiment is largely bearish on TRUMP, while discussions about Trump's overall involvement in crypto are more mixed, reflecting a range of opinions on the legitimacy and implications of his financial activities.
Threads shaping the discussion
Read the original discussions
Scores and comment counts are snapshots captured when this briefing was prepared.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4




